Last Friday, a press release was jointly issued by Ministry of National Development, Ministry of Finance and Monetary Authority of Singapore to make adjustments to the Seller’s Stamp Duty (SSD) and Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) framework, with effect from 11 March 2017.
1) The holding period liable for SSD is revised from 4 to 3 years. There is also a 4 percent reduction every year on the original SSD payable.
2) TDSR is exempted for mortgage equity withdrawal loans with LTV (Loan To Value) ratios of 50 percent and below.
3) A new stamp duty Additional Conveyance Duties (ACD) is introduced for residential property transactions undertaken via transfer of shares in property-holding entities. The seller pays a flat rate of 12 percent for a 3-year holding period. On top of that, a prevailing 0.2 percent stamp duty for transfer of shares applies.
Contrary to those who celebrated by dumping more money into new launch and property stock counters, the sudden tweak of the property measures is not a good sign for the property market.
1. If everything is going to be fine, you don’t have to do anything.
Singapore introduced the first round of cooling measures in September 2009. The last round of property measures, the 8th and the hardest round with the new TDSR framework, was announced in June 2013.
After that, for a long 45 months, the government stayed firm on its implementation. The intention is to ensure that there is a ‘meaningful correction’ and a ‘soft landing’ of the property market. A pre-mature lifting of the property measures would undo the government’s efforts to make home prices affordable. The government would monitor the market and adjust when necessary.
Necessary move was finally taken last Friday.
When the adjustment is on Seller’s Stamp Duty but not Additional Buyer Stamp Duty, this is not good.
Relaxing the ABSD implies that the government wants to stimulate demand. But tweaking the SSD means that the government perceives the market will go through a tough time soon. When the group of owners with less holding power decides to cut loss, we have to ensure that they can afford paying the SSD.
Fed rates are expected to increase at least 3 times this year. With the slowdown of the economy and oversupply in the current market, things are not going to be fine.
2. If it works so well, forget about market going up any further.
Hong Kong property prices have increased more than 150 percent since 2009 and 370 percent since 2003. The government has announced borrowing restrictions and 15 percent hike in stamp duties. Still, prices continue to reach record high in new projects.
Similarly, countries like Australia, New Zealand and Canada have imposed tighter rules for foreign investment in properties. Still, their real estate market proves to be more resilient than ever.
As economist John Maynard Kaynes said, “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.”
Singapore seems to be the only odd one out that defies the norm for the effectiveness of property measures.
Since the enforcement of TDSR, prices have dropped 11.2 percent from the peak.
While government in other countries are deciding whether to impose new restrictions, Singapore has already started fine-tuning some rules without worrying any U-turn in the market.
So, forget about any hope that prices can recover any time soon.
3. If the obvious option is not available, there is only one way out.
Under the Qualifying Certificate(QC) regulation, developers have to sell all units within two years of obtaining the Temporary Occupation Permit, or to pay extension charges on the unsold units. If developers can’t sell all units in their project after 5 years, they have to pay ABSD on the remaining units.
But developers have found a smarter way out by moving their outstanding stock through transfer of shares.
In January, banker Wee Cho Yaw used a company to buy over 45 remaining units of The Nassim for S$411.6 million, through the purchase of a 100 percent stake in Nassim Hill Realty from CapitaLand.
Last July, City Developments forked out $410.96 million for Wing Tai Holdings’ joint venture Summervale Properties which owns Nouvel 18 condo. Just 3 months later in October, the unsold units were offloaded to a group of Singapore investors via a S$977.6 million profit participation securities platform with an annual payout. Out of that S$102 million was raised through issuing equity shares.
With the new Additional Conveyance Duties, the loophole was plugged. Developers with projects that are approaching the deadlines have no choice but to pay ABSD and extension charges.
CapitaLand just called for an extension of timeframe for developers liable to ABSD and QC. It is also asking the government to relook the definition of a foreign developer.
So far CapitaLand have paid $8.03 million for The Interlace and $2.56 million for d’Leedon in extension charges. This is not a big sum for a big developer.
ACD should still be bearable for large developers that are cash-rich and financially sound. But this may not be true for smaller developers holding onto unsold units in projects that are fast approaching the deadlines.
When the option of share transfer is not feasible, pricing cutting to move leftovers off the shelves is the only way out.
A good sign for the home buyers: It is really no rush for the new launch. Many good offers are on the way.
As the saying goes, they always save the best (bargains) for last.
Did you watch my video “2018 Singapore Property Market – what developers, agents, banks and analysts are hiding from you”? Watch it now!
Fred says
Now that the loophole of owner’s share transfer is addressed, the only way out for developers is to price down their holdings. The G has been mollycoddling these developers long enough. Time to payback.
For first timers, wait for these developers to price down. For second and even third property purchasers, factor in the ABSD as the prices fall off their high.
Property Soul says
Thanks for your comments. You best summarize what the tweaking of cooling measures is going to affect the property market.
Mandy says
Thanks very much for the insightful article. This was refreshing in the light of bullish interpretations of these tweaks.
Regarding the SSD but not ABSD tweaks – I do differ slightly in interpretation. As this tweak applies to future purchases and is not retroactive, it seems to (slightly) stimulate demand for new purchases, rather than provide a way out for current ones. Perhaps it is to deal with the oversupply. I wonder what are your thoughts on this.
Property Soul says
When buyers make the decision to buy, they concern more about ABSD then SSD. ABSD involves the sum of initial investment. However, it only triggers SSD if they sell in 3 years which will be some years down the road. I don’t think many buyers are that long-sighted. That’s why I believe that this is more to pre-empt the effect of the possible series of hike in interest rates.
Ros says
I bought my forever home in Nov 2016. Now , my condo is in process of enbloc circus show . If it goes thru I will have to pay SSD. A lawyer friend said that there is a fund that is made up of contributions from all other SP. Is this true? And if this is true, and I am SP who has lived there from day 1 , why should I?
Ros says
Is there a fund. ( contributions from SP) that help new owners of condominium undergoing enbloc sale . A lawyer friend has advised that there is such a fund
Property Soul says
I have not heard of such arrangement. You should consult a conveyancing lawyer.